124671 -

: SVM Management argued that because they offered the plaintiffs everything they personally asked for, there was no longer a "controversy," making the case moot .

: To prevent defendants from constantly "picking off" plaintiffs, the court noted that if a motion for class certification is already pending, a tender cannot moot the case. 4. Key Takeaways and Legacy 124671

: The court explicitly declined to follow the federal Campbell-Ewald standard, asserting its role as the final arbiter of Illinois state law. : SVM Management argued that because they offered

The plaintiffs sought to bring a on behalf of other tenants. However, before the plaintiffs filed a motion to certify the class, the defendant "tendered" (offered) the full amount of the individual damages plus costs and fees to the named plaintiffs. 2. The Legal Controversy: The "Mootness" Doctrine Key Takeaways and Legacy : The court explicitly