While the initial public and administrative reaction was swift, the legal proceedings highlighted issues of procedural fairness.
The court also pointed out that the video footage used as the primary evidence had not undergone formal forensic testing at the time of dismissal.
In October 2024, the Rajasthan High Court ordered Saini's reinstatement. The court noted that he had been dismissed without a proper inquiry or a chance to be heard, rendering the termination order illegal. While the initial public and administrative reaction was
The case moved beyond simple professional misconduct into criminal territory due to the minor's presence and the digital nature of the content.
Despite the reinstatement order, further judicial challenges have occurred, with more recent reports from February 2025 indicating stay orders on his re-joining. Ethical and Social Implications Ethics of Viral Video Sharing | PDF - Scribd The court noted that he had been dismissed
Following a departmental inquiry, both Saini and the constable were suspended on September 8, 2021. Shortly after, the Rajasthan government terminated their services under the Rajasthan Civil Services Rules .
💡 This case highlights that for public officials, "private" actions recorded digitally can instantly become grounds for dismissal if they violate the moral and legal standards expected of their office. Judicial Reversal and Due Process Ethical and Social Implications Ethics of Viral Video
Authorities registered a case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act , viewing the incident through the lens of child safety.